On the 60th anniversary of the end of the Pacific War of WW2, an article about the Canadian role in defending Hongkong: The Globe and Mail: The Dirty War, Part 1
The 60th anniversary of the Allied victory over Japan may be a bit low-key — too many Canadians are simply unaware of what happened to the ill-prepared force Ottawa rushed to the defence of Hong Kong. As a result, ROD MICKLEBURGH explains, they don't know how vicious the Pacific war was or how it shaped the modern world.
e.p.c. posted this at 09:51 GMT on 7-Aug-2005 .
Archive Link
The NYT has an article today about the rise in online extortion, where someone contacts a business with threats to disrupt the business via online activities unless a payment is made: The Rise of the Digital Thugs - New York Times.
EARLY last year, the corporate stalker made his move. He sent more than a dozen menacing e-mail messages to Daniel I. Videtto, the president of MicroPatent, a patent and trademarking firm, threatening to derail its operations unless he was paid $17 million.
What happened to MicroPatent is happening to other companies. Law enforcement authorities and computer security specialists warn that new breeds of white-collar criminals are on the prowl: corporate stalkers who are either computer-savvy extortionists, looking to shake down companies for large bribes, or malicious competitors who are trying to gain an upper hand in the marketplace.
One point the article blithely skims over is the role of the victim's approach to managing information technology may make it susceptible to such attacks.
Now, in no way am I blaming the victim here, I don't know all the circumstances, and what the criminal did was illegal, however if you don't manage your I/T well and don't approach it as a critical business asset, you do make your organization susceptible to compromise and attacks.
In this case the company had grown quickly through acquistions and (allegedly) not been careful with the remnants of the acquiree's networks.
The extortionist managed to use one of these networks to gain access to the company's internal business systems, and that was the ballgame.
At a former employer, we had many discussions and arguments over the years in the 1990s over how to integrate (and some times segregate) the many internal networks, let alone the process to integrate the networks of an acquistion.
In one meeting of the internal ICC, the lead I/T guy from a recent acquisition surprised and upset the rest of the ICC crew by declaring that he would not open his network up to the company-wide network but would instead firewall it off and only open select ports and specific systems.
The reason he gave was surprising but understandable: no one could give him a precise accounting of who was on the internal company-wide network.
In as much as it upset many people, it also started several other groups on the same track: since the company had not funded any sort of company-wide management of the internal network, and each of these guys was responsible for their small segment, they decided to ratchet down the connections to the rest of the intranet.
I suspect that, for awhile, it helped control damage from some of the widespread worms, though not necessarily prevent it.
e.p.c. posted this at 11:37 GMT on 7-Aug-2005 .
Archive Link
We went for a walk this afternoon, down to DUMBO.
Ostensibly to go to the Tiger Beer Singapore Chili Crab Festival but mostly just to take an amble through the neighborhood.
First we walked down Hicks Street past the Ice Cream Cone Face thing:
Lisa noticed this a couple months ago. It may have been there forever, or it may be a couple months old. We're not exactly the most observant couple.
Yes, this is apparently the corner of Hicks Street and Hicks Street (it’s where Hicks Street was cut off by the BQE and becomes the Cadman Plaza exit ramp).
Then we headed down under the BQE into the Fulton-Ferry/DUMBO neighborhood.
Five Front is the neighborhood restaurant we fallen in love with.
Since Tinto closed a couple of years ago we hadn't had a place we felt comfortable in.
I mean, we go to Henry's End, Noodle Pudding, and practically have a direct line with Iron Chef House,
but Five Front manages to have both a relaxing, hang-loose atmosphere, and excellent food.
Five Front Street, Brooklyn, NY. Home of the Five Front restaurant.
We then wandered down Front Street and crossed over into the stub of Brooklyn Bridge park which is under the Manhattan Bridge.
There we saw what appeared to be Tibetan prayer flags
…they were indeed prayer flags of a sort,
but there didn't appear to be a single theme to them.
I don't know if they were there for the Hiroshima anniversary (our initial theory),
the WTC (which they sort of faced
) or some other cause or event.
I put together a photo set at flickr of some of the flags.
Of course
Frisket had to get into the act as well:

.
Oh, and the Tiger Beer Singapore Chili Crab Festival?
Not so interesting or fun …several hundred people crammed into a short stretch of Water Street.
And ponies, which are close enough to horses to still scare the heck out of Frisket.
e.p.c. posted this at 15:44 GMT on 7-Aug-2005 .
Archive Link
Nice article at Bloomberg Markets about
Skype, a peer-to-peer, voice-over-IP telephone system which runs on Microsoft Windows, and Apple OS X (and I believe other platforms).
I first started using Skype at Azaleos and thought the call quality was good, and generally was satisfied with it.
Occasionally though it would totally freak out, which may have been due as much to the vagaries of setting up the little-used microphones on PCs as due to any problems with network congestion.
I find the quality and reliability of Vonage to be better than Skype, but not by much.
About the only serious problem I have with Skype is the general problem that I really hate talking on the phone.
I think it's a carry-over from being the target of 200,000 IBMers who wanted to bitch daily about anything Internet related and felt that I should be the one to take the call.
With Skype the problem is that you can be listed in the directory, or not at all.
Maybe it's just a peak into a world I'm not familiar with, but with my privacy settings wide open I was getting skype-calls and IMs regularly from people I didn't know at all.
Now I have my settings set to block anyone who isn't in my contact list from calling or messaging me.
Skype was founded by the same guys who created the Kazaa P2P file sharing service.
They get revenue from selling SkypeOut minutes (use Skype to call non-Skype numbers) and
SkypeIn (call a Skype user from a non-Skype system).
Like Kazaa, Skype relies on peer-to-peer technology, which taps the computing power of participants’ PCs. There are no costs for centralized servers, switches or other equipment. Calls within the Skype network are free, and calls to regular telephones are cheap.
I've used network based telephony off and on for years, starting with an IBM product for OS/2 which I vaguely recall was named "Person-2-Person/2" or, ironically, P2P/2.
P2P/2 was a collaborative work application, built around OS/2's multimedia features.
It had a shared whiteboard, shared workspace, and voice-over-network capabilities.
Today it would probably be a great tool, but in 1995-1997 it was as slow as a mule in the Mojave desert (I'm presuming that's really slow, having never seen a mule in the Mojave).
The voice quality...well, it didn't suck, but it was tinny and frequently dropped out, regardless of the network protocol in use (it could use either APPC over SNA or TCP/IP).
I briefly tried using Yahoo! messenger's audio chat in the 1999-2000 timeframe when I was travelling to and living in Sydney, Australia.
Was better than P2P/2 but still not great, even over the ginormous internet bandwidth we had in the Olympic's ITCC to my mother's broadband system in the U.S.
The difference with Skype is that your call gets routed through many computers.
I'm guessing it's possible that the same packets of information get routed in parallel, but perhaps not.
But, where in the past one client either connected directly to the other client, or the two clients connected to a third-party central server, Skype connects your client to multiple intermediary clients between you and the person you're Skype-ing.
By making the connection more complex it becomes more reliable.
If an intermediary network drops out (errant backhoe, evil squirrel, etc.) the software immediately switches over to another parallel network connection between two other computers.
You might here the call drop briefly, if anything at all.
Now, if your broadband connection drops, then you're out of luck entirely.
My DSL connection is very reliable, yet it drops maybe once a day, just for an instant.
Since that's the only path out, there's no backup path for the network to take and the call drops
(To be fair to my DSL provider, some times it's my flaky router which freezes up when it overheats).
Now, note one word in that last graph: broadband.
Skype has been possible for years, but what makes it successful is the widespread deployment of broadband in homes and businesses.
Five years ago most homes in the US were just beginning to hear about broadband, and who in their right mind would pay over US$100/month for the ability to read email or surf the web 舜faster̵d;?
Now, the price has come down (though for how long is uncertain since the FCC just switched the classification of DSL).
More small-medium businesses are connected via broadband, where five years ago their only option was a T1 or flaky ISDN line.
More homes have broadband, because the kids need it for school, and the parents need it for work.
Skype takes advantage of this: when you're not using Skype, it's still using your connection.
It's using your computer as one of those intermediary computers to route calls through.
There's no such thing as a free lunch, and the cost of using Skype is sharing the burden of the traffic.
Otherwise Skype is free of financial costs (unless you use the added features).
To be clear: when you install Skype, you install an application which automatically routes other people's network traffic through your system.
This alone is not a bad thing, but it's something to be aware of.
Assuming the Skype software solely allows data traffic, then it should not serve as a vector into your system for viruses, worms, or computer criminals.
Back to broadband: the growth and prevalance of broadband, always-on connections, is fertile ground for many new applications comparable to Skype.
The next killer-application I expect to see would combine Bittorrent (background distributed download manager) with a professionally managed video channel.
Why pay cable companies to carry your specialized channel when you can bypass them and go directly to the consumer?
Cable companies had a chance to lock in customers with flexible channel offerings and ala carte subscriptions, but they appear to have rejected that totally.
Now they are going to lose the lock on distributing content that they've had, it may take some years, and no I'm not predicting the complete end of cable TV. But if the goal of a content producer is to get content in the hands of readers and viewers, why not bypass the intermediaries who control the channel allocations and advertising slots?
Skype is the first wave of these applications which can only exist and can only succeed in an always-on, broadband universe.
e.p.c. posted this at 17:03 GMT on 7-Aug-2005 .
Archive Link
I'm heading out to Illinois later this week for ten-fourteen days with friends and family.
Lisa will fly out for a week since half her team is based in Chicago.
I plan to head to beautiful downtown Denham, IN for a couple of days at the family farm, followed by a week in and around Chicago.
Frisket will be making the trip, but as mentioned at her site, she has kennel cough so she might not be able to hook up with her friends in the greater Sycamore and Hoffman Estates areas.
Lisa and I had dinner at Sushi Samba 7 tonight.
I had the pastel and several orders of seviche and tiraditos.
Lisa managed to have some of my tiraditos as well as several delicious rolls.
We followed dinner with an amble up Bleecker to 8th avenue.
Bleecker is changing rapidly, seeing Ralph Lauren and Marc Jacobs stores was quite surprising.
I need to find a new music playlist service, audioscrobbler has gone AWOL, and I know everyone is just dying to know what I'm listening to (it's currently The Power of Rebolution Can't Fail
from London Booted for the dreadfully curious).
e.p.c. posted this at 22:49 GMT on 7-Aug-2005 .
Archive Link
Peter Merholz takes on Clay Shirky in peterme.com: Clay Shirky's Viewpoints are Overrated: Clay's whole argument predicates a black-and-white distinction between evil hierarchy on one side and good tags on the other... And while Clay is right to question hierarchy, and, particularly, Yahoo's less-than-optimal use of it, he neglects to distinguish truly useful forms of professionally-created classification and categorization, which undermines his argument. (He continues to set tags against folders-and-hierarchies, as if there are no other ways of classifying information. Sigh.)
e.p.c. posted this at 23:29 GMT on 7-Aug-2005 .
Archive Link