Oops. Boxed out by SixApart
2004-05-13T23:35:03Z
MovableType has announced a new licensing regime to go along with a Developer's Release 3.0
and, well, I'm going to be migrating off MT.
I pay for software I like, and the rates that SixApart will be charging are quite in line with what I'd expect and would pay for.
But I don't pay for things which drastically limit what I can do.
As far as I can tell (and admittedly there's little to go on), it's the same software for personal and commercial users, whether you have 5 or twenty authors, or 1-20 weblogs, however the rates (and restrictions) vary depending on the number of authors, number of weblogs, etc.
It's frustrating for me personally because I could easily use MovableType for some of the commercial services I expected to offer this year. I 've gotten quite good at coding MT and combining MT and PHP.
I really like MovableType. I liked that it was portable, open (to the extent I could read and manipulate the code, and change it as necessary within the then existing license). There's a great developer community. And it felt baked, done, ready for use. Not some amorphous blob being developed en masse.
But, as far as I can tell, I still would not be able to offer any services based on MT, no matter what license I acquire for myself, nor recommend to my clients.
Furthermore, since I have started running Google Adsense ads on my personal sites (which have earned a whopping $0.24 to date), the only legitimate license option is a commercial license.
Even running the occasional Amazon tip jar, or a Paypal tip jar would prevent one from using the personal / non-commercial license.
Now, $699 seems hefty for a personal site, but I'd pay it if there were no limits on number of blogs nor number of authors, were there a license option that were applicable.
There isn't an applicable option though.
$699 is not bad for a commercial license. But $699 is unacceptable with the restrictions in place.
And, since the text of the licenses is unavailable to review, I'm left with few options.
So effectively immediately I'm ceasing my development work with MovableType and putting together a migration plan off MT.
I dumped Radio Userland because of various restrictions and the yearly rental fee that was assessed. I have no idea what I would be signing up for if I did license MT.
So, I will route around the damage and find something else to use.
Related articles
«dodgeball: yet another social networking thing (for cellphones) | Main | On MovableType licensing»
Comments
Pat added:
The text of the licences is <a href="http://www.movabletype.org/legal.shtml"here
…Friday, 14 May 2004 5:11 GMT 2004-05-14T05:11:19Z
Pat added:
Whoops! Finger trouble http://www.movabletype.org/legal.shtml
…Friday, 14 May 2004 5:12 GMT 2004-05-14T05:12:10Z
epc added:
Thanks. I don't see that page linked anywhere on the redesigned MT site, at least not in the dicussion about which license to acquire (http://secure.sixapart.com/). The FAQ page does link way deep down to the Personal license.
At any rate, reading the text of the commercial license confirms my instincts: I can no longer use MT personally, nor recommend it to my clients (even recommending it may conflict with the commercial license, and I certainly cannot resell services to clients based on custom configurations of MT).
Again, for me this isn't about the cost. The cost is negligible. It's the various restrictions on use that box me out. SixApart wants to continue to supply the tools and make money off that, I have no problem with that. SixApart also wants to control how the tools are used and prevent others from, well, making money off using the tools. I can't abide by that and it makes my plans untenable so long as I rely on MovableType, so I will take my interests and plans elsewhere.
…Friday, 14 May 2004 8:02 GMT 2004-05-14T08:02:40Z