CIDR SUBNET MASK CHEATSHEET
CIDR SUBNET MASK CHEATSHEET & ICMP TYPE CODES
e.p.c. posted this at 13:03 GMT on 8-May-2004 . Archive Link
CIDR SUBNET MASK CHEATSHEET & ICMP TYPE CODES
e.p.c. posted this at 13:03 GMT on 8-May-2004 . Archive Link
I thought this was an excellent essay. I do not think the media today serves the public's purpose at all. It appeals to the lowest, basest denominator of what will sell. In Media Revolt: A Manifesto, David Neiwert writes:
Journalism is kind of like the weather. We all like to complain about it, but none of us ever do anything about it.
Some more excerpts:
How do we fight the war on terror? (Other than buying an SUV and being a good consumer and keeping your head down and voting Republican, that is.) Well, have you heard anything in the way of serious national dialogue about this point? I haven't, not to any great extent, and for a simple reason: The media have declined to facilitate that discussion.
They have instead defaulted to Position A: Whatever course of action George W. Bush takes is a priori good, and done for sound reasons. Neither, for that matter, is his competence ever seriously questioned.
The reality, as I've been discussing, is that Bush's "war on terror" is an incomprehensible exercise in increasing the likelihood that high radicalized, highly motivated terrorists will again strike on American soil. A serious war on terror would begin from a recognition of the nature of the threat, with a considered response that's both flexible and comprehensive. Bush's Iraq war is none of these.
And the American public will never hear this from its mainstream media, especially not the dysfunctional, inbred family that is the Beltway press corps.
For too long, the public has been forced to rely on the mass media as the means for obtaining and disseminating information. This was not a serious problem for most of our history. Though the means for spreading information had to go through the traditional filter of the media gateways (particularly editors and reporters), the system in fact worked generally well, as long as a measure of independence was present within the press itself.
As the conglomeration and consolidation of the mass media has proceeded apace through the past two decades unchecked, that independence has largely vanished or become effectively strangled, and with it a responsible treatment of the public interest by the nation's press. The traditional media filters have instead become bottlenecks, preventing information that is in fact vital for the public well-being from ever reaching them -- oftentimes for reasons that are trivial and puerile, not to mention geared toward the manipulation of the media in the service of corporate powers and their agenda.
Read more here.
e.p.c. posted this at 17:21 GMT on 8-May-2004 . Archive Link